Regulate Murder?

July 22, 2016 09:00 AM

Following the fallout of the Supreme Court’s decision in Whole Women’s Health v. Hellerstedt, American Life League took the opportunity to explain why outcry over the failure to regulate killing centers is pointless. According to Judie Brown, “The whole idea of ‘regulating' abortion is flawed. . . . The Supreme Court serves as a blaring wake-up call to the ‘mainstream’ pro-life movement that . . . killing can never serve as a replacement for [ending abortion]."

Judie was the recent guest on Jim Sedlak’s weekly Radio Maria radio program. In that hour she explains what makes American Life League distinct from the mainstream pro-life movement. We’ve taken some excerpts from the program and posted them to Facebook. Those clips are embedded below. (For the full program, listen here.)

If you think the pro-life movement is winning the battle for life, think again after listening to what Judie has to say.

When did it become 'pro-life' to regulate child-killing?

Judie Brown tells us how the politics of opposing abortion has overshadowed the principle of ending it.

Posted by American Life League on Friday, July 15, 2016

 

How the 'abortion issue' undermined the pro-life movement

Judie Brown explains what went wrong within the pro-life movement.

Posted by American Life League on Friday, July 15, 2016

 

 

 

 

Has there ever been a pro-life success at the Federal level?

Over 40 years and some groups in the pro-life movement insist on political pragmatism.

Posted by American Life League on Wednesday, July 20, 2016

 

 

 

Back to news