issues Abortion   | 148 - DOCS |

Abortion: How Much Do You Know? (Question 2)
by ALL
Released October 13, 2005

Is abortion ever medically necessary?

Abortion is never necessary to save a mother's life.

It is important to distinguish between direct abortion, which is the intentional and willed destruction of a preborn child, and a legitimate treatment a pregnant mother may choose to save her life. Operations that are performed to save the life of the mother-such as the removal of a cancerous uterus or an ectopic pregnancy that poses the threat of imminent death-are considered indirect abortions.

They are justified under a concept called the "principle of double effect." Under this principle, the death of the child is an unintended effect of an operation independently justified by the necessity of saving the mother's life.

Essentially, both mother and child should be treated as patients. A doctor should try to protect both. However, in the course of treating a woman, if her child dies, that is not considered abortion.

Today it is possible for almost any patient to be brought through pregnancy alive, unless she suffers from a fatal disease such as cancer or leukemia, and if so, abortion would be unlikely to prolong, much less save the life of the mother.

-Alan Guttmacher, former Planned Parenthood president


Open a printer friendly version of this article.
 

Send an e-mail to a friend about this article!

 

 


 
 
Video Story: Personhood, Politics, and You
Judie Brown, President of American Life League, explains the difference between "compromised incrementalism" and "principled incrementalism."


  Pro-Life Story: The Lost Child
Posted By Nancy Addie on Jul, 14 2007
     April 1976..... It's almost midnight and I am sitting in the bathroom wringing my hands and wiping away tears. I am waiting to see if my life is going to change or if I am ... Read

Share your own Pro-Life Story here!

 

 

 

 

 

 


I'm New    |    Site Map    |    Donate Now    |    Contact Us
© 2009 American Life League, Inc.